立即登录 | 免费注册
全部学科 | 内科学 | 心血管病学 | 内分泌学与糖尿病 | 神经病学 | 消化病学 | 呼吸病学 | 肿瘤学 | 妇产科学 | 骨科学
疾病中心: 高血压 | 冠心病 | 心力衰竭 | 心律失常 | 脂肪性肝病 | 糖尿病 | 卒中 | 慢性阻塞性肺病 | 子宫内膜异位症 | 乳腺癌 | 肺癌 | 结直肠癌 | 器官移植
Loading
当前位置:医药资讯 > 医学资讯内容

兰索拉唑对控制不佳的儿童哮喘无效

Lansoprazole Disappoints for Poorly Controlled Asthma in Kids

BY SHARON WORCESTER  |   2012-01-24
中文 | ENGLISH | 打印| 推荐给好友
上一篇: 那他珠单抗相关PML的新危险因素确定
下一篇: BRCA1/2突变提示卵巢癌生存率较高

The proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole was no better than placebo for improving symptoms and lung function in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial involving more than 300 children with poorly controlled asthma without overt gastroesophageal reflux.

Those treated with lansoprazole did, however, experience significantly more respiratory infections (relative risk, 1.3), sore throats (RR, 1.3), and episodes of bronchitis (RR, 2.2) than did those receiving placebo during the course of the 24-week study. The treatment group also experienced more activity-related bone fractures (6 vs. 1 in treatment vs. placebo groups, respectively), although this difference did not reach significance, Dr. Nicola Hanania and her colleagues from the Writing Committee for the American Lung Association Asthma Clinical Research Centers reported in the Jan. 25 issue of JAMA.

The mean difference in change in Asthma Control Questionnaire scores between the 149 children treated with 15-30 mg/day of lansoprazole depending on weight and the 157 who received placebo in the Study of Acid Reflux in Children With Asthma was 0.2 units, which was less than the meaningful clinically important difference in both groups (–0.1 for lansoprazole, and –0.2 for placebo), and was not statistically significant. Mean differences in change for secondary outcomes, including forced expiratory volume in the first second, asthma-related quality of life, and rate of episodes of poor asthma control, also did not differ significantly between the groups, Dr. Hanania of Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, and her colleagues reported (JAMA 2012;307:373-81).

Additionally, lansoprazole had no treatment effect, compared with placebo, in a subanalysis of 49 study participants (20 in the placebo group and 29 in the lansoprazole group) who were found on esophageal pH studies to have gastroesophageal reflux (GER), they noted.

Untreated GER has been considered a possible cause of inadequate asthma control in children treated with inhaled corticosteroids, but proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have not been well studied with respect to their use for asymptomatic GER in children with refractory asthma.

For the current double-masked study, children were enrolled between April 2007 and September 2010 at 19 academic clinical centers throughout the United States. They had a mean age of 11 years (range 6-17 years), 50% were black, 65% were boys, and all were using inhaled corticosteroids. Most had required an intervention for asthma symptoms in the year prior to enrollment, and the mean Asthma Control Questionnaire score was high, at 1.6 for both groups, which is consistent with poor asthma control.

The lansoprazole dose used for the study was based on weight, with patients weighing less than 30 kg receiving 15 mg/day, and those weighing 30 kg or more receiving 30 mg/day.

The findings indicate that the drug has no effect on asthma control measures, the investigators wrote. “This was the case even though GER was prevalent in the study sample,” they noted. It was also the case in subgroups defined by markers of asthma severity.

“The results of this clinical trial are uniformly negative regarding the benefit of acid suppression therapy on symptom relief, lung function, airways reactivity, or quality of life,” they said, concluding that in light of previous negative findings from a study of omeprazole, the use of PPI therapy in children with poorly controlled asthma is unwarranted.

The findings also raise important questions about the adverse effects of lansoprazole in children, and along with other concerning data that have led to two U.S. Food and Drug Administration Advisory Board Reviews in the past 2 years, they underscore the need for continued study of PPI safety in children, they said.

Although the activity-related fractures in the lansoprazole group were not significantly more common than in the placebo group (6 of 149 [4%] vs. 1 of 157 [less than 1%]; P = .06), they are a cause for concern. Of the seven fractures, one occurred on the day of randomization; the others occurred after 2 months (n = 1), 5 months (n = 3), and 6 months (n = 2) of follow-up. The affected children were 7-14 years old, and all had been taking inhaled corticosteroids during the trial; two had taken oral prednisone as well (one in each group).

Findings Highlight Problem of “Therapeutic Creep.” In an accompanying editorial, Dr. Fernando D. Martinez wrote that despite “unimpressive evidence” derived largely from anecdotal experience in regard to a consistent role of gastroesophageal reflux in asthma morbidity, children with asthma often are treated with antireflux medications (JAMA 2012;307:406-7). One study demonstrated that 13- to 14-year-old children with asthma were more than eight times more likely to be treated with antireflux therapy than those without asthma, said Dr. Martinez, who is at the Arizona Respiratory Center, BIO5 Institute and Clinical and Translational Science Institute at the University of Arizona, Tucson.

The practice represents “therapeutic creep” – or the extension of the use of a treatment with real or suggestive therapeutic effects observed in a certain age group or certain disease phenotype to other patients in whom the efficacy has never been demonstrated – and its perils and costs are highlighted in this study by Dr. Hanania and her colleagues, Dr. Martinez said.

Children in the study who were treated with lansoprazole were more likely than those treated with placebo to experience a number of adverse effects, including respiratory infections – without any improvement in asthma symptoms. Of even greater concern was a finding of increased activity-related bone fractures in the lansoprazole group, Dr. Martinez said, noting that this is the first large randomized controlled trial to look at this potential complication of PPIs in children.

Although the finding didn’t reach statistical significance, it should be considered “in the framework of a substantial body of evidence that has prompted the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to issue an advisory about the risk of fractures in adults taking PPIs chronically,” he said.

The findings of this study should strongly discourage the generalized use of PPIs for treating asthma, and a tentative recommendation by the current U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines for an empirical trial of antireflux therapy in patients with poorly controlled asthma – based on the few data available at the time the guidelines were written – should be promptly revised, Dr. Martinez concluded. (The discussion continues in an exclusive video interview with Dr. Janet T. Holbrook, of The Johns Hopkins University.)

This study was supported by the American Lung Association Asthma Clinical Research Centers, as well as by grants from the U.S. National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Lansoprazole and placebo were provided by Takeda Pharmaceuticals; albuterol was provided by GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. Hanania and her coauthors had no disclosures to report.

Dr. Martinez has served as a consultant to MedImmune and has presented at an Abbott-sponsored seminar.

Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Global Medical News. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

一项纳入300多例哮喘控制不佳但无明显胃食管反流的患儿的随机、安慰剂对照试验显示,质子泵抑制剂兰索拉唑在缓解症状和改善肺功能方面并不优于安慰剂。休斯敦Baylor医学院的Nicola Hanania博士及美国肺脏学会哮喘临床研究中心写作委员会的同事开展的这项研究,在125《美国医学会杂志》上发表(JAMA 2012;307:373-81)

不仅如此,在
24周研究期间,兰索拉唑组患儿发生呼吸道感染[相对风险(RR)1.3]、咽喉痛(RR1.3)和支气管炎发作(RR2.2)的风险均显著高于安慰剂组。而且,兰索拉唑组有更多患儿发生活动相关性骨折(6 vs. 1),虽然这一差异未达到统计学意义。

未治疗的胃食管反流已被认为是吸入性皮质激素对儿童哮喘控制不佳的一种可能原因,但质子泵抑制剂是否对难治性哮喘患儿的无症状胃食管反流有效尚未得到充分研究。为此,研究者开展了“哮喘患儿酸反流研究”
(SARCWA),纳入20074~20109月美国19个临床中心收治的无明显胃食管反流的难治性哮喘患儿,平均年龄为11(6~17)50%为黑人,男孩占65%,均在使用吸入性皮质激素。绝大多数患儿在入组前1年内曾因哮喘症状而需要干预。哮喘控制量表评分较高,两组均为1.6,提示哮喘控制不佳。

结果显示,兰索拉唑组
149例患儿(剂量为15~30 mg/d,依据体重而定,体重低于30 kg者使用15 mg/d,体重≥30 kg者使用30 mg/d)和安慰剂组157例患儿在哮喘控制量表评分改变方面的平均差异为0.2,不具有显著性差异,两组分别减少0.10.2。在次要终点(包括第1秒用力呼气量、哮喘相关生活质量、哮喘控制不佳的发生率)的改变方面,两组间也无显著差异。

49例经食管pH值检查证实存在胃食管反流的患儿(20例来自安慰剂组,29例来自兰索拉唑组)进行的亚组分析显示,与安慰剂相比,兰索拉唑无任何治疗作用。

研究者指出,上述结果表明,虽然有部分患儿的确合并胃食管反流,但兰索拉唑对哮喘控制指标无影响。而且根据哮喘严重程度分层进行亚组分析,仍然得出一致结果。研究者称,与既往针对奥美拉唑的研究一样,本项研究也提示对哮喘控制不佳患儿给予质子泵抑制剂治疗缺乏根据。而且上述结果还进一步表明,兰索拉唑可能给儿童带来一系列不良反应。由于这类担忧,美国食品药品管理局
(FDA)顾问委员会在过去2年间进行了审评,认为有必要继续研究儿童使用兰索拉唑的安全性。

虽然兰索拉唑组的活动相关性骨折并不显著多于安慰剂组
(4% vs. 0.7%P=0.06),但仍然令人担忧。在总共7例骨折中,1例发生于随机分组当天,其余6例分别发生于随访2个月后(n=1)5个月后(n=3)6个月后(n=2)。骨折患儿的年龄为7~14岁,均曾在试验期间使用吸入性皮质激素,其中2例还服用了强的松(两组各1)

亚利桑那大学呼吸中心的
Fernando D. Martinez博士在随刊述评中指出,虽然并无高质量证据的支持,但出于哮喘常常合并胃食管反流的考虑,临床医生常对哮喘患儿使用抗反流药物(JAMA 2012;307:406-7)。一项研究显示,年龄13~14岁的哮喘患儿接受抗反流治疗的比例比非哮喘患儿高8倍。

Martinez
博士将这种现象称为“治疗潜变”,即在特定年龄段或特定疾病表型的患者中被证明有效的治疗手段被用在其疗效尚未得到证实的其他患者中。上述研究表明,这种做法不仅增加费用而且伴有风险。这项研究中,接受兰索拉唑治疗的患儿更易发生包括呼吸道感染在内的多种不良反应,而哮喘症状并无改善。Martinez博士还指出,这是首次在大规模随机对照试验中评价儿童活动相关性骨折这种质子泵抑制剂治疗的潜在并发症。虽然结果并未达到统计学意义,但仍然值得警惕。

根据该研究结果,强烈不支持使用质子泵抑制剂治疗哮喘。美国国立心肺血液研究所现行指南提出了对哮喘控制不佳患儿给予抗反流经验性治疗的试行建议,作者认为应当对其及时修订。

本项研究获得了美国肺脏学会哮喘临床研究中心的支持,并获得了由美国国立卫生研究院、美国国立心肺血液研究所提供的补助金。兰索拉唑和安慰剂均由武田制药提供,沙丁胺醇由葛兰素史克提供。
Hanania博士及合著者均无利益冲突披露。Martinez博士曾担任MedImmune的顾问,曾参加由雅培主办的研讨会。

爱思唯尔
  版权所有


Subjects:
gastroenterology, pulmonology, allergy, pediatrics, Pediatrics
学科代码:
消化病学, 呼吸病学, 变态反应、哮喘病与免疫学, 儿科学, 新生儿学
关键词: 质子泵抑制剂,无明显胃食管反流的难治性哮喘患儿

慢性心衰诊治:规范中求突破
黄峻
2012-2-1
南京医科大学第一附属医院
房颤治疗:手段渐趋丰富 新型治疗药物不断涌现 非药物治疗备受关注
马长生
2012-2-1
首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院
注重老年人群特征 优化管理

刘梅林
2012-2-1
北京大学第一医院老年内科

 

相关文章

关注糖尿病,聚焦GLP-1!案例征集大赛

时间:2011-3~~2011-11
由中国医师协会主办、礼来国际贸易(上海)有限公司协办、爱思唯尔国际出版集团承办的“精彩案例我分享——关注糖尿病•聚焦GLP-1”案例征集活动将于2011年3月~ 11月在全国范围隆重展开。

关注青光眼患者, 让世界更明亮!

时间:2011-4~~2011-12
《中华眼科杂志》发起,辉瑞制药资助,旨在交流青光眼治疗理念,分享国内抗青光眼药物固定联合治疗经验的病例交流活动.

聚焦哮喘和COPD联合制剂治疗

时间:2010-12~~2011-12
哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是常见、多发的气道炎症性疾病,这类疾病严重影响患者的生活质量。我们特别组织了该类案例征集活动,奖品丰厚,快来参与!

中国选择 达标看我

时间:2011-9~~2012-9
本次活动对典型病例以分享的形式总结临床经验,通过跨专科、多层次的学术交流,对降压治疗方案、疗效进行解析与点评。