立即登录 | 免费注册
全部学科 | 内科学 | 心血管病学 | 内分泌学与糖尿病 | 神经病学 | 消化病学 | 呼吸病学 | 肿瘤学 | 妇产科学 | 骨科学
疾病中心： 高血压 | 冠心病 | 心力衰竭 | 心律失常 | 脂肪性肝病 | 糖尿病 | 卒中 | 慢性阻塞性肺病 | 子宫内膜异位症 | 乳腺癌 | 肺癌 | 结直肠癌 | 器官移植
Loading
当前位置：期刊中心 > 全球精选文摘 > 文摘导读

足月妊娠引产与期待疗法之比较

Term Labor Induction Compared With Expectant Management
Glantz JC   |    2010/8/19 14:02:24   | 
Obstet Gynecol  |   2010   |          View at Publisher
专家评级： ★★  |    循证评级： B   |  【全球专家评论】 |   打印| 推荐给好友
上一篇： 采用阵列比较基因组杂交技术对出现于妊娠第10~20周的胎儿死亡进行遗传学评估
下一篇： 妊娠前3个月阴道出血与妊娠后期并发症
Objective:
To determine whether changing the definition of the group to which induction is being compared (ie, noninduced delivering during the same week as those induced compared with two definitions of expectant management) changes the association of labor induction and increased cesarean risk.

Methods:
A New York State birth-certificate database was used to estimate odds ratios for cesarean delivery associated with labor induction at term. The analyses used three definitions of controls: cesarean delivery after induction compared with after spontaneous labor by week (week-to-week), induction at a given gestation age compared with expectant management of all other women after gestational age (all above), or induction at a given gestational age compared with expectant management of all other women at or after that gestational age (at or above). Chi-square logistic regression was used for comparisons and adjustment for possible confounders.

Results:
All variations of comparison groups were associated with increased unadjusted cesarean risk after induction, although not after 39weeks in the all-above group. After adjustment, increased risk persisted from 37 to 41weeks using the week-to-week group and from 38 to 41weeks in the at-or-above group (odds ratios 1.24 to 1.45) but was no longer significant in the all-above group. The excess cesarean delivery risk associated with labor induction is between 1 and 2 per 25 inductions.

Conclusion:
Labor induction is associated with increased cesarean risk whether using a week-to-week comparison group or an expectant group that includes women the same week or beyond that of the index induction, even after adjustment for parity, high-risk factors, and demographic variables. Although the magnitude of increased risk for a given woman undergoing induction is not large, women nonetheless should be informed of this increased risk.

Level of Evidence:
II.
关键词:

请登录后发表评论，点击此处登录。

慢性心衰诊治：规范中求突破
黄峻
2012-2-1
南京医科大学第一附属医院
房颤治疗：手段渐趋丰富 新型治疗药物不断涌现 非药物治疗备受关注
马长生
2012-2-1
首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院
注重老年人群特征 优化管理

刘梅林
2012-2-1
北京大学第一医院老年内科

 
相关文章