高级搜索
立即登录 | 免费注册
当前位置 >   首页 (神经病学) > 期刊文献 > 全球精选文摘 > 文摘导读
双侧深脑刺激与最佳医学治疗对晚期帕金森病患者疗效的比较:一项随机对照试验
Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation vs Best Medical Therapy for Patients With Advanced Parkinson Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Weaver FM, Follett K, Stern M  2009/5/27 10:50:00 
【发表评论】 【全球专家评论】
打印| 推荐给好友

JAMA, 2009, Volume 301, Issue 1 
专家评级:
循证评级:
A

      View at Publisher

Context:
Deep brain stimulation is an accepted treatment for advanced Parkinson disease (PD), although there are few randomized trials comparing treatments, and most studies exclude older patients.

Objective:
To compare 6-month outcomes for patients with PD who received deep brain stimulation or best medical therapy.

Design, Setting, and Patients:
Randomized controlled trial of patients who received either deep brain stimulation or best medical therapy, stratified by study site and patient age (<70 years vs ≥70 years) at 7 Veterans Affairs and 6 university hospitals between May 2002 and October 2005. A total of 255 patients with PD (Hoehn and Yahr stage ≥2 while not taking medications) were enrolled; 25% were aged 70 years or older. The final 6-month follow-up visit occurred in May 2006.

Intervention:
Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (n=60) or globus pallidus (n=61). Patients receiving best medical therapy (n=134) were actively managed by movement disorder neurologists.

Main Outcome Measures:
The primary outcome was time spent in the “on” state (good motor control with unimpeded motor function) without troubling dyskinesia, using motor diaries. Other outcomes included motor function, quality of life, neurocognitive function, and adverse events.

Results:
Patients who received deep brain stimulation gained a mean of 4.6h/d of on time without troubling dyskinesia compared with 0h/d for patients who received best medical therapy (between group mean difference, 4.5h/d [95% CI, 3.7-5.4h/d]; P<.001). Motor function improved significantly (P<.001) with deep brain stimulation vs best medical therapy, such that 71% of deep brain stimulation patients and 32% of best medical therapy patients experienced clinically meaningful motor function improvements (≥5 points). Compared with the best medical therapy group, the deep brain stimulation group experienced significant improvements in the summary measure of quality of life and on 7 of 8 PD quality-of-life scores (P<.001). Neurocognitive testing revealed small decrements in some areas of information processing for patients receiving deep brain stimulation vs best medical therapy. At least 1 serious adverse event occurred in 49 deep brain stimulation patients and 15 best medical therapy patients (P<.001), including 39 adverse events related to the surgical procedure and 1 death secondary to cerebral hemorrhage.

Conclusion:
In this randomized controlled trial of patients with advanced PD, deep brain stimulation was more effective than best medical therapy in improving on time without troubling dyskinesias, motor function, and quality of life at 6 months, but was associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events.

Trial Registration:
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00056563.
 

  评论

请登录后发表评论,点击此处登录。

疾病资源中心  疾病资源中心
卒中  

病例分析 <span class="ModTitle_Intro_Right" id="EPMI_Home_MedicalCases_Intro_div" onclick="javascript:window.location='http://portal.elseviermed.cn/tabid/127/Default.aspx'" onmouseover="javascript:document.getElementById('EPMI_Home_MedicalCases_Intro_div').style.cursor='pointer';document.getElementById('EPMI_Home_MedicalCases_Intro_div').style.textDecoration='underline';"  onmouseout="javascript:document.getElementById('EPMI_Home_MedicalCases_Intro_div').style.textDecoration='none';">[栏目介绍]</span>  病例分析 [栏目介绍]

摘自:《脑电图精粹》(主译:元小冬  许亚茹),北京大学医学出版社出版

 

男孩,8岁,出现双侧上肢和躯干抽搐发作,没有明显的意识改变。患者具有病毒性脑膜脑炎后的严重抑制性脑病,并出现失明和四肢瘫。患者没有应用中枢神经系统兴奋剂。

医学数据库  医学数据库